Follow this forum: Subscribe above to receive an email when anyone responds or add the RSS Feed below into your own newsfeed reader.
Got your I-194?
Reply here with how long it took. Months, weeks, days...
Hi All, this is on the official CBP website. https://www.cbp.gov/travel/international-visitors/admission-forms/form-i-92-application-advance-permission-enter-nonimmigrant
“Lapse in Federal Funding Impact on CBP Website Operations Notice
NOTICE: Due to the lapse in federal funding, this website will not be actively managed. This website was last updated on December 21, 2018 and will not be updated until after funding is enacted. As such, information on this website may not be up to date. Transactions submitted via this website might not be processed and we will not be able to respond to inquiries until after appropriations are enacted.”
I have not had responses for tracking emails..which I am assuming falls under this notice.. :( I sure hope that they are processing waivers..I had a few people drop off paperwork, and the Custom officers said that they are..so hopefully, that is true..any updates from you all would be great...
No Pearson is STILL not open. (Since July 16 2018)
Niagara Falls (Rainbow Bridge)
Monday-Thursday 2pm-9pm
Sunday 5pm-9pm
There is no trucks allowed at the Rainbow Bridge which makes it an ideal spot. Its also easy to find and there is no waiting. They can show up at 8pm and be seen immediately.
If they have any problems finding it etc, they can call my cell, 416-843-1371
@John Rogers, is Pearson International accepting waiver applications? if so, what are the hours to attend? I have a client who will be there on Tuesday or Wednesday...Thanks!
@ricky470 what you have been told is NOT true.
I have 2 clients with waivers dated SINCE December 23. I am not surprised the emails may have stopped for now.
I would advise waiting until the shutdown is over before emailing ARO. Despite Trumps bluster, this cannot go on much longer.
I filed a waiver back in May 2018 and it has been 240 days since filed. I emailed the CBP designated email ( regarding waivers twice in the last month and no response has been given back besides the automated email. Today, I called the port where I filed the application and the officer said that due to the US Government funding and shutdown situation, no waivers have been processed since December 23rd and no one is even at the CBP Waiver office at the moment.
Has anyone gotten a waiver recently?
Any speculation on when this will be resolved?
This is quite concerning!
On #1575 yes it would be too early.
On your other point, another waiver I just found out was granted in less that 60 days. That's at least 8 waivers granted in significantly less than 90 days, all granted before Christmas. Not all were re-applicants but most of them were.
I have been telling clients it should be granted in 90 days or LESS, specifically so if this does NOT happen, they will call me. Hopefully I can give more information as to whether this is a trend or blip. I assume Michelle is probably seeing them come in faster as well, but maybe hasn't had the time to post. If she is like us, January is a pretty busy month.
#1575 - If they overstayed and were denied in 2017 and given a 10 year ban would you not think it too early in their ban to apply for a waiver and be successful in the granting of that waiver?
Please keep us informed as to the outcome.
Any waiver experts here wish to weigh in on this?
#1572
Just another point. I was told that some of the bleed over from visa cases being approved (that normally would require a more extensive vetting) probably would affect the adjudication of CERTAIN waivers (there has been evidence of this) as certain agencies' databases weren't being accessed that normally would be in the adjudication process. I would surmise that waivers that are sent into "secondary security" are perhaps the most egregious cases and ones that come back quickly are more "slam-dunk" type cases.
This is not to suggest any leniency but perhaps a less rigorous vetting.
No matter the case I have yet to do a waiver (most likely later this year will get on it) ...could probably do it myself and most certainly with the help of my attorney friend but when she tells me that my BEST course of action is to go to a waiver specialist such as yourself or whoever else then I take that advice seriously.
Good points. I was getting some calls because people were assuming that now might be the time to apply vs waiting because they are assuming things are very lenient right now.
And as you correctly pointed out, Visa vs Waiver cases might be completely different.
#1570
Trust that your point is well taken. In no way was I trying to suggest "marginal waivers" are being approved.
The immigration attorney I'm referencing actually has been in practice for 17-18 years and specializes in US immigration (US based). She does not claim to be a waiver specialist/expert by any means as that is not her focus at all. She merely relayed information to me from her recent experiences where she has seen visas be approved that normally would not be approved without RFEs, etc... Actually she was somewhat shocked and surprised by this and in conference with her colleagues put it down to resources being put elsewhere in the adjudication of these things.
I will say this - she has definitely intimated to me that it be best that I use a Canadian based waiver specialist in my case. She is a long standing friend so I trust her on her word in this matter. In America apparently these things are typically handled by attorneys but Canada has a different system that allows paralegals, etc to do things that normally only lawyers in America would handle. Trust that I can only relay the information she has provided me as obviously this sort of thing falls outside my purview.
Nonetheless I appreciate that you felt the need to weigh in on this. As you clearly stated "please be cautious with this"... Obviously your phraseology suggests that you are of prudent mind. Trust that I, too, am of prudent mind but only relayed information provided to me from someone who is by no means a flake or inexperienced.
“From what I've heard from a very experienced immigration attorney a great deal of waivers and visas (E-2, EB-5, etc) are being approved that normally wouldn't be approved because they simply don't have the resources to do the really extensive adjudication researches they normally would do. (That is the supposition apparently).”
Please be cautious with this. When a waiver cannot be quickly approved (most are coming in 90 days or less) they are put in "secondary security" which slows down the process. In other words, people who applied in January 2018 who are getting rejections are just getting them in December.
When I hear 'experienced immigration attorney' I think "guy who probably sees less than half the waivers I do" and I am seeing approved waivers being quick, but problem ones are slow and people ARE getting rejected. I met a lot of people at the Airport who had shaky waivers before they shut it down in July 2018, sometimes 50-80 people every Tuesday. These were waivers they did themselves or used some horrible companies, and lawyers.
These people are in many cases still waiting for an answer, and the ones from last December 2017, January and Feb 2018 are just getting registered letters NOW saying they are rejected. Trafficking especially.
So although I am seeing a "hint" of what this person is saying, overall I am not seeing some flood of marginal waivers approved. I still average an appeal a week, and turn down 2 others, mainly because most people realize its just smarter to reapply after more time than appeal and wait months for another "no".
My sources in Homeland Security tell me they aren't being more lenient in Herndon Va, but have taken resources away from northern borders and focused on Mexico, as a way of making splashy headlines that forward the Trump agenda of "Mexican killers and rapists are pouring into the border".
I have no comment on visas, only waivers. As you all know, I look for patterns all the time, and I am not seeing enough evidence (other than anecdotal) that its MUCH easier.
On here we had the poster with the prostitution who was successful after 3.5 years, and Michelles client, but these are just 2 examples. I would argue they aren't that out of line with past results.
I would also argue that Michelle tries to discourage cases that are 50/50 because of her integrity, and she does an excellent job. So I am not surprised by her success with her 10 year ban case at all.
#1566 - jazzsax1
It's a do as I say not as I do equation with the Trump administration.
From what I've heard from a very experienced immigration attorney a great deal of waivers and visas (E-2, EB-5, etc) are being approved that normally wouldn't be approved because they simply don't have the resources to do the really extensive adjudication researches they normally would do. (That is the supposition apparently).
YOU TYPE: | YOU SEE: |
---|---|
_italic_ | italic |
*bold* | bold |
"This is quoted text." | This is quoted text. |
::This is a title | This is a title |
:::This is a smaller title | This is a smaller title |
--- | |
% inline code text % | inline code text |
+Bulleted unordered list item+ +Bulleted unordered list item+ |
|
#Bulleted ordered list item# #Bulleted ordered list item# |
|
YES: http://www.google.com NO: www.google.com YES: email@email.com |
http://www.google.com www.google.com email@email.com |